I believe you should always put the link to the web site near the end of the email – although many writers like to put that link at the start – or something at the start and the end.

The reason some writers go for the link to the web site at the start is that their success is often judged by the number of people who hit the link and go to the web site.

On that basis a link at the start and the end seems reasonable – but it really does little other than up the number of people clicking on the link rather than reading on. Most surveys show that it doesn’t actually get you more orders.

Those people are not prepared for what follows on the web site by good exciting copy in the email tend not to order, unless they are already sure what to buy.

What’s more, when all the emphasis is on “click throughs” then some very important other information is lost.

Consider this: if people don’t open the email, we know the subject line or the “from” person was not good enough to attract attention.

If people don’t click through, when the click through is at the foot of the email, we know that the copy of the email was no good.

But if there is a click through at the foot of the email and it works, and people click through in big numbers, then we know that the copy as worked in exciting and intriguing readers. They are now ready for the features and details on the web site.

So my point is that by putting the link at the foot of the email you can judge what is going on.

a) no opens – the subject or from is wrong
b) no click throughs – the text is wrong
c) lots of click throughs but no orders – the web site is wrong.

This final point is interesting, because many firms still send casual readers just to their web site, rather than to a specially designed landing page. If you create a new page for each advert, then you can judge that page’s effectiveness – and keep tweaking it until it really delivers and you get

a) lots of opens
b) lots of click throughs
c) lots of orders.

This is the sort of work Hamilton House does with many of its Velocity clients. There are more details on http://www.velocity.ac/education.html

Or call 01536 399 000. We’re very nice people.

Hamilton House Mailings Ltd reg number 2444392 VAT 354907535GB. Phone 01536 399 000.

We have had a few calls since then about other low cost ways of advertising to schools.

These fall into our “background marketing” approach – they are not intended to be ways of making huge numbers of sales (although you can strike lucky, especially if you got the £5k contract I mentioned before) but rather should bring in modest sales and keep your company name in front of teachers all the time.

One particularly interesting approach in this regard is shared emails wherein you reach 10,000 relevant teacher email addresses, for just £99.

Forthcoming dates for this service include

January 30th Careers
January 30th Music
February
6th D&T
6th Deputy Head
20th English
20th Site Manager
28th ICT
28th Primary
28th Maths

Details are on http://www.emails.gs/Email10000.html and if you want to see what a shared email looks like go to http://www.emails.gs/sample_shared.html

Tony
Hamilton House Mailings Ltd reg number 2444392 VAT 354907535GB. Phone 01536 399 000.

I am a little late this term in getting the report out, but it is now on line at http://www.hamilton-house.com/free%20reports/When.pdf

Topics included are listed below…

1. Recent changes in schools

1.1 The funding of schools

1.2 New money for building, and other reforms

1.3 Free schools and academies

1.4 The English Baccalaureate

2. Levels of marketing to schools

2.1 Postal direct mail

2.2 Generic lists

2.3 Personal and subscription email lists

2.4 Shared postal and shared email

2.5 Email marketing reports

3. How schools deal with direct mail and email

4. The special issue of courses for teachers

5. The appropriate style of advertising

6. Selling to schools 2012

7. The creative approach

8. Effective approaches often omitted

9. Summary of postal media

9.1 Solo postal mailing

9.2 Shared postal mailing

9.3 Mailing lists

9.4 Email lists

10. Websites

10.1 UK Education News and The Schools Blog

10.2 Website Landing Pages

11. Blogs

12. The Efficiency Issue

Tony

Hamilton House Mailings Ltd reg number 2444392 VAT 354907535GB. Phone 01536 399 000.

Background advertising is helpful – but you will also need to market your product or service very positively to teachers from time to time – and that’s what I want to turn to today – foreground advertising.

Perhaps the most powerful approach to foreground advertising that there is, is known as EPE – which is short for Email / Postal / Email.

EPE starts by sending an email to the teacher that you want to reach in which you highlight the benefits of your product and give a link to your web site. At the end of the piece you also say that you will shortly be sending out some more information in the post.

Part two of EPE involves sending out that postal campaign – normally a letter and a brochure or a leaflet.

Finally you send a second email which says that the brochure has been sent, but that if the teacher didn’t get the letter then you will happily send another one. You also give the link to the web site again.

The EPE process is especially powerful when the emails and letters are addressed to teachers by name. The service works because it allows you to reach teachers three times, without the teachers feeling that they are being swamped by promotions, and encourages those who normally only read emails to look for your postal promotion, and vice versa.

Best of all you don’t have to invest a fortune in EPE, because it can be tested with a small trial mailing at the start.

A trial run of 500 schools including two sets of emails (where ever possible to the personal email addresses of the teachers you want to reach), followed by a postal campaign and then a second email, costs just 59p per school.

If, once you have seen the sales generated by the 500 school trial, you decide to go ahead and undertake an EPE campaign to a further 4500 schools the price per school for this promotion drops to 49p.

You can of course select the types of school that you want to mail by age range, funding, location etc, as well as the role in the school of the teacher you want to reach.

The prices include email transmission, use of the relevant lists, postage and packing. In fact the only thing not included is the printing – although we can of course quote for that if you wish.

The full report on background marketing to schools is on…
http://www.blog.educationmarketing.org.uk/2012/01/03/how-some-did-well-in-school-marketing-last-year/ For more information on that, or on EPE please call 01536 399 000.

But there are three techniques available for getting far more out of your marketing than you might imagine. Sadly, not everyone uses these techniques, but when they do, most people find they can raise response rates dramatically.

The first approach is to devise a campaign, rather than a one off promotion. This might involve creating five or six adverts that will run over a period of time, each linked but with a different approach or style.

The point about such a campaign is that it tends to have a central theme that holds all the adverts together. So your campaign might be price orientated but in each advert you focus on one totally different product or service, rather than trying to suggest you do everything.

You will quickly find which products or services you can sell directly, and then in future you can use those products as the lead-in to your full range.

Another approach involves changing the medium, rather than developing the message. If, like many firms, you have been focussing on email marketing to schools, colleges or universities for some time, you might find that a change to postal mailing can bring in terrific results.

Curiously postal marketing used to be known as junk mail, and derided everywhere. Now a lot of people look down on email, and postal marketing is held in higher esteem. Of course postal marketing is more expensive – but since the results can be many orders of magnitude higher, it can be worthwhile.

Thirdly there is the possibility of changing your selling point. If you have been selling on price for a long time, you could try selling by asking an interesting question or promoting a benefit. You might even try a quirky or humorous campaign.

The point in all cases is that only by running a series of adverts over time can you find out which adverts work best for you.

Of course if you are bringing in huge responses to each advert already you won’t want to change, but if you feel that response rates are not all they might be, you might well want to look at running a series of alternatives to see just what might be achieved.

If you would like to find out once and for all which advertising approach is right for you, one way of doing this is through our Velocity service. Not only will we devise the campaign with you, but we can help write it, and will also offer to run it at much lower costs than apply to one-off campaigns.

There are details on www.velocity.ac – or call us on 01536 399 000.

Tony Attwood

Here’s an email that came in this morning…

“I was forwarded an email from you to my line manager this morning.

“My department currently has a surplus of approximately £5000 which we must spend before the end of the financial year. I would like to explore the possibility of purchasing a set of i-pads or a suitable Android Tablet which could be used by students…”

This request is interesting – first it confirms my point that schools do have money to spend before the end of term.

Second it confirms that emails of interest (such as the one we send out offering the Product Finder service) do read and do get forwarded around the school. All one has to do is get the text right.

Third, it shows that the “product finder” service works (which we know because we get requests in all the time).

To become a company that gets forwarded details of requests like this from schools, you need to be listed on the School Procurement Site at www.top5.org.uk The basic cost is £25 per year, although you can have an enhanced listing for more (see http://www.top5.org.uk/Suppliers.html) The site along with the free product finder service is promoted regularly to schools).

For details on this or any of these low cost marketing approaches please do call 01536 399 000 or see http://www.educationmarketing.org.uk/Services.html where there is a broader summary of our services.

Also to book into the School Procurement Service again call 01536 999 000.

Hamilton House Mailings Ltd reg number 2444392 VAT 354907535GB. Phone 01536 399 000.

Obviously since HHM sells marketing services focussed on education, I am biased in this regard, but over the years I have managed to look at a few schemes that are not quite what they are cracked up to be.

The world of marketing to schools has been quite quiet of late, but suddenly we are getting a little flurry of adverts that seem to be a little close to the edge. I mention each of them as they arrive, but of course it is up to you if you take note or not.

The latest one suggests that marketing to schools via fax is a good idea. In fact a huge number of schools are listed on the Fax Preference Service, which means that you should not fax them without their express permission.

Worse, schools in general are very savvy about the FPS, and they know full well that they are listed. So if you do fax these schools you can expect some fairly hearty replies.

Of course some schools are not FPS registered, but they tend to be schools that don’t take much notice of faxes anyway. I would say, be cautious.

Tony
Hamilton House Mailings Ltd reg number 2444392 VAT 354907535GB. Phone 01536 399 000.

In its place, he will introduce new courses of study in Computer Science.

The move, which has been pushed by the gaming industry is aimed at giving schools the freedom to create their own ICT and Computer Science curricula that equip pupils with the skills employers want.

The British Computer Society and ICT professional association Naace, confirm the current National Curriculum Programme of Study is dull and unsatisfactory. Some respondents to a 2008 e-Skills study said that GCSE ICT was “so harmful, boring and/or irrelevant it should simply be scrapped”.

The Education Secretary also said he was keen for high-quality qualifications in Computer Science to be developed, and welcomed industry-giant IBM’s involvement.

Education Secretary Michael Gove said in his speech:

Our school system has not prepared children for this new world. Millions have left school over the past decade without even the basics they need for a decent job. And the current curriculum cannot prepare British students to work at the very forefront of technological change.

The best degrees in Computer Science are among the most rigorous and respected qualifications in the world… and prepare students for immensely rewarding careers and world-changing innovations. But you’d never know that from the current ICT curriculum.

This is why we are withdrawing it from September. Technology in schools will no longer be micro-managed by Whitehall. By withdrawing the Programme of Study, we’re giving teachers freedom over what and how to teach, revolutionising ICT as we know it.

Universities, businesses and others will have the opportunity to devise new courses and exams. In particular, we want to see universities and businesses create new high-quality Computer Science GCSEs, and develop curricula encouraging schools to make use of the brilliant Computer Science content available on the web.

ICT will remain a compulsory part of the National Curriculum, pending the National Curriculum review.

He added:

Imagine the dramatic change which could be possible in just a few years, once we remove the roadblock of the existing ICT curriculum. Instead of children bored out of their minds being taught how to use Word and Excel by bored teachers, we could have 11-year-olds able to write simple 2D computer animations using an MIT tool called Scratch. By 16, they could have an understanding of formal logic previously covered only in University courses and be writing their own Apps for smartphones.

This is not an airy promise from an MP – this is the prediction of people like Ian Livingstone who have built world-class companies from Computer Science.

You can follow all the news on schooling on www.ukeducationnews.co.uk

__._,_.___

These stories are supplemented by a number of advertisements from companies, advertising to schools.

An advertisement on the site costs just £25, and lasts about five days on line. However the advertisement also appears in full on www.blog.schools.co.uk where it remains available for search engines to find, for at least a year.

If you would like advertise on UK Education News just send an email to Chris@hamilton-house.com with a Word file attachment, with your selected headline and the text of your announcement – exactly as you wish it to appear. We will copy that directly into www.blog.schools.co.uk and copy the headline into UK Education News.

Just add a note to the effect that you want to be listed and agree the fee of £25 plus VAT. We’ll drop you a note to let you know your advert will appear.

Tony Attwood
PS: You can also follow us on www.blog.educationmarketing@yahoogroups and on Twitter @HHMailings

Hamilton House Mailings Ltd reg number 2444392 VAT 354907535GB. Phone 01536 399 000.

This database is being sold a maximum of ten times to avoid data saturation

which struck me as rather odd, since a database of school addresses is hardly unique to one company. So even if they only sold it once, that would hardly reduce the number of items each of the schools on their list receives.

This is, I think, just part of the everyday goobledegook that is increasingly being put into adverts for educational marketing processes. It is perhaps a modern version of the old mouse mat adverts that claimed that at any moment now the government was only going to allow schools to access certain internet sites, and that somehow this decision was linked to a mouse mat (on which you should advertise).

The mouse mat was irrelevant, but it was introduced to distract you, so you didn’t think, “hang on, is this really true – is the government restricting school access?”

In fact it doesn’t matter how often this company sells their database, because there are a lot of people in the wider world with a schools database. The reason they have written this into the advert is to encourage the reader to accept the fact that the database is at a very low price, but not ask “why is the database sold at a low price?”

Another variant on this involves people who advertise the fact that they have got vast numbers of teachers to opt in to their database – all said amidst other claims about how and when the database was updated. In this case it tries to stop you thinking “how on earth did they get 95% of all teachers to opt in?”

The approach is clever – but mischievous – in my opinion. All I can say is that if you are faced with an offer that looks remarkably cheap, or amazing in terms of the number of “opt in” email addresses you have, watch out. They might be using this technique in the advert which distracts you through a bit of meaningless flim-flam to stop you thinking “is this possible?” or “so what?”

Tony Attwood

Hamilton House Mailings Ltd reg number 2444392 VAT 354907535GB. Phone 01536 399 000.